FEZA innovation – Home
← All products

Development on request

Greenhouse & Farm Operations

Greenhouse & Farm Software

Consider plot activities alongside harvest batches and input costs. In the greenhouse and farming software we will build, we will connect irrigation, fertilisation, crop treatments and batches sent to buyers around your field operations.

  • Activities by plot
  • Harvests linked to buyers
  • Defined threshold records
Vegetable greenhouse, harvest crate and sprayer beside a tablet showing plots and growth stages
  1. Discovery
  2. Scope and quote
  3. Development

Trace harvest-batch activities without piecing together notebooks

When a buyer asks about a batch's history, you need to know which records belong to each plot. Separate treatment books, irrigation notes and harvest slips make linking activities to batches difficult. Costs held only as total expenses also prevent plot-level assessment. We will plan greenhouse, block and plot identifiers as the shared basis for activity and harvest records. States can distinguish missing historical information from new entries not yet recorded.

Records that split plot information

  • Treatment dates and harvest quantities appear in different notebooks.
  • Fertiliser and energy costs are totalled without plot allocation.

Fields to connect in the project

  • Activity dates and responsible people can link to the plot.
  • Harvest quantities, grades and batch numbers can link through the same record.

From plot activity records to harvest batches

Let us choose recording order using one plot and season. Information staff can measure in the field differs from values supplied by authorised specialists. Comparing this flow with your notebooks will help us select required fields and checks together.

  1. 01

    Define the plot

    Crop, variety, planting date and area can enter a plot card. Greenhouse and block relationships will follow your business's naming arrangements.

  2. 02

    Record activities

    Irrigation duration, fertiliser mixes, treatment products, doses and operators can link to the plot. Pre-harvest intervals and thresholds will follow definitions from you or your agronomist.

  3. 03

    Link harvests to batches

    Quantities, grades and batch numbers can be scoped together. Tracking which buyer receives each batch and preparing its records will be designed around your needs.

Start with field records, then choose costs and data connections

Let us choose a starting point based on your recording habits. Plot and activity relationships can form a tracking scope. We will consider manual entries, requested device readings and report sources separately.

  1. Initial field scope

    Plots and activities
    Greenhouses, blocks, plots, irrigation, fertilisation and treatment records could form the starting scope. Harvest quantities and batches can link to these fields.
  2. Further requirements

    Costs and traceability
    Allocation of seedling, fertiliser, treatment, labour and energy expenses to plots can be added. Buyer batch summaries and offline entry needs will be selected separately.
  3. Work dependent on devices

    Reading sensor data
    Temperature and humidity transfers will be examined if existing sensors or automation offer data access. This scope concerns recording, tracking and alerts; valve and heating control are excluded from the starting scope.

Compare recording priorities in greenhouse blocks and open-field plots

If you operate both, shared activity records can be retained while data detail is selected separately. Covered growing may need more climate records; open-field work may prioritise plot and activity histories. We will define naming and cost allocation for each around your seasonal arrangements.

Area identity

Greenhouse block
Greenhouses, blocks and plots can be linked.
Open-field plot
Plots and crops can follow your existing naming system.

Climate data

Greenhouse block
Temperature and humidity can come from manual entries or suitable devices.
Open-field plot
Required climate fields can be selected separately.

Shared activities

Greenhouse block
Irrigation, fertilisation and treatments can link to the block.
Open-field plot
The same record types can be scoped by plot and season.

Separate activity entry from authority to define growing thresholds

Let us distinguish field entries from expert assessment. Operators can enter actual activities while dose and pre-harvest interval changes need a separate decision on responsibility. The software we will build can include correction histories and boundaries for authorised fields.

Field and specialist checks

Activity entry, plot editing and interval definitions can have separate permissions. Agronomist checks can differ from supervisors' daily entries.

Buyer and cost access

Selected batch-summary fields need not expose every business cost. Buyer contacts and expense reports can have separate permissions.

Staff and agricultural records

KVKK, Turkey's personal data protection law, will be considered for staff and buyer personal data; your business is the data controller. Agricultural requirements, buyer documents and inspection records will be assessed with your authorised specialists.

Review missing activity records before opening a harvest batch

Before creating a batch, assess missing details in the plot's activity history. Irrigation may have been entered under another block or a treatment date reported late. We can retain corrections' links to plots and harvests. A warning can be planned when your defined pre-harvest interval has not elapsed. Its source, missing information and specialist review will be considered together; your authorised team decides agricultural activities and harvesting. Retaining reasons for changing older records is another project option.

What leaves batch history unclear

  • Activities entered against the wrong plot leave the harvest history incomplete.
  • A treatment date changes later and the previous information is lost.

Records to design for review

  • Plot corrections can link to reasons and authorised users.
  • Defined intervals and related activities can enter harvest checks.

Match plot names, activity books and harvest slips

First, examine consistency in area names. Different names for the same greenhouse can make batch links difficult. Using anonymised examples, we can select sources for plot, crop and date fields and choose how missing history will be marked.

  1. 01

    Prepare a plot dictionary

    Map greenhouse, block and plot names. Define area and quantity units separately to check which plot codes should receive old harvest slips.

  2. 02

    Verify a batch sample

    Compare a harvest's quantity, buyer and preceding activities in a trial transfer. Your authorised specialist will verify interval definitions as initial data.

  3. 03

    Choose devices and connectivity

    If sensor readings are accessible, examine missing measurements and timestamps. If offline field entry is selected, synchronisation and conflicting-record checks will be scoped separately.

Explore automation for transferring plot records

Before discussing scope, identify who receives each activity report and through which document. Service and project examples can help discuss data collection and handovers within the workflow. Greenhouse measurement, specialist review and buyer summaries will be defined from your examples.

Discuss scope with a plot notebook and harvest-batch slip

Prepare a blank plot activity form, harvest slip and expense-allocation example. Remove personal information from shared documents. Explain when field entries occur and when specialists check them so we can choose first-release detail together.

  • Give examples of greenhouse, block and plot names.
  • Identify who defines pre-harvest intervals and thresholds.
  • Share sensor models and offline-record expectations.

The proposal will reflect record types, batch links, cost allocation and data access before plot numbers. Subscription use and support boundaries will be discussed in writing; additional development will be considered separately.

How we work

We do not sell an off-the-shelf package: we design the software around your workflow, build the first version in short steps and keep running it after launch.

  1. 01

    Discovery

    We listen to how your business works, your team and the tools you use today.

  2. 02

    Scope and quote

    Modules, priorities and price are set out in a written quote.

  3. 03

    Development

    We show working versions at short intervals and move on with your feedback.

  4. 04

    Setup and migration

    We move your existing records across and help your team get started.

  5. 05

    Support

    We run the software on a subscription and keep it up to date and secure.

Frequently asked questions

Do we need to buy sensors?

No. Values can be entered by phone or computer. If your greenhouse has sensors, whether their data can be brought into the software depends on the make and model; we look at this together in the discovery meeting.

Will the software run our climate control, valves or heating?

We design this software as a record, tracking and alert layer: it does not open valves or switch on the heating, and your automation system carries on doing its job. If you want data read from it, whether the system allows that is examined per project.

Does the software set pre-harvest intervals?

No. You or your agronomist define the interval and the dose from the product label. The software applies the values you enter, reminds and warns at harvest time, and gives no agronomic advice.

Can records be entered in a greenhouse with poor signal?

We can design mobile entry to record offline and sync once a connection returns. Alerts reaching you naturally need a connection, so if you rely on critical alerts, a connection point at the greenhouse entrance is needed.

Will the records be enough for good agricultural practice (GAP) certification or buyer audits?

Irrigation, fertigation, spraying and harvest records are kept with dates and operators and can be exported. Whether they are sufficient for a certification scheme or a buyer audit is for your auditor and agronomist to judge.

Can it be built for open-field farming too?

Yes. Climate tracking matters less outdoors, but parcel, spraying, fertigation, harvest and cost records can be scoped to work the same way in open fields.

How could missing history be handled in a batch summary?

Activities not transferred or entered can be marked separately. Discovery will determine which records enter a batch summary and who completes missing information.

Would energy costs be distributed equally across every plot?

Your business determines the allocation method. Expense sources, seasons and plot shares can be defined in the project, keeping total expenses separate from plot-level assessment.

How is the price set?

After a discovery meeting we prepare a written quote covering the scope, the modules and the setup work. The software is provided on a monthly or annual subscription.

Do we receive the source code?

In our standard model the software is provided on a subscription and the source code is not transferred. If you need a different model, it is agreed in a separate written contract.

Who is responsible for what is done with the software?

We build and operate the software. The business using it is responsible for how it is used, the data entered and the content published; the details are set out in the service agreement.

Related products

Design a record flow from plot to harvest batch

Share activity and harvest examples so we can choose development scope for your business together.

  • Activities by plot
  • Harvests linked to buyers
  • Defined threshold records